Archive for the 'Tunnel(s)' Category



If the State’s PR put out “real” messaging

If the State’s PR put out “real” messaging it would read something like this:

INSTEAD, as Burt Wilson correctly points out in his blog “Oh no! Not Again!”, here’s the state’s PR piece about the Delta Tunnels:

Burt says, “Just when we thought that the California Water Fix” (aka BDCP Delta Tunnels plan) “had come up with the dumbest campaign ever, they have gone and topped themselves.” He goes on to say break down why their PR is so wrong:

“We know,” they say (as if they are the only ones who can figure out their own campaign) “that California’s aging (there’s that word again. I think they mean that it’s as old as the governor!) water distribution infrastructure makes (they put in a verb here as if the water infrastructure can act!) dry years in our state even worse.” Can you believe this? The static water infrastructure can act to make dry years even worse?

And do you wonder how our aging infrastructure can “strain” our water supply? Once more they throw words to the wind as if they were meaningless–which this campaign is, by the way.

Is this what their PR agency is actually being paid for? I wish they would tell us how our aging infrastructure makes our dry years even worse!”

The Fable of the Farmer and the Fish

A year ago I sent a notice out about the children’s book I wrote, The Fable of the Farmer and the Fish.

  I’d hoped to write a clear explanation that even children will understand illustrating the fundamental issue behind the California water wars, why Governor Brown’s Delta Tunnels are not the needed solution and instead propose a true, long-term solution. Set in the format of a children’s book.

I received a lot of feedback that people would like to see it more available for their children. Even adults enjoyed it.

Available on Amazon (Click Here) for iPhone, iPad, PC and Kindle. There is a nominal Kindle download cost. Proceeds go to the Save the California Delta Alliance.

Illustrations by Steve Greenfield, Discovery Bay resident. Thanks, Steve.

I hope people enjoy it.

The EPA Agrees – the Delta Tunnels are bad news

The EPA submits a 43-page report warning that the Delta Tunnels could violate Federal law.” See the Sacramento Bee Report. Also reported in the LA Times.

The 43-page review against the Delta Tunnels agrees with what we and other BDCP opponents have been saying all along:

  • The tunnels may be good for the farmers and municipalities that receive the water but not for farmers and municipalities who divert water directly from the Delta.
  • The project failed to analyze environmental effects both upstream and downstream of the Delta, particularly on San Francisco Bay.
  • The BDCP plan to restore the Delta by habitat projects yet there is no evidence that restoration would be effective.
  • The EPA recommends the BDCP ensure sufficient water flow through the Delta for it to remain healthy. The Delta needs fresh water to remain healthy, a fact the water contractors have ignored from the start.

The EPA Review itself: http://www.epa.gov/region9/nepa/letters/ca/bay-delta-conservation-plan-deis.pdf

The EPA review also advocates consideration of a variety of approaches, a suite of measures, including water conservation, levee maintenance and reduced reliance on the Delta. Sounds like what our Northern California legislators, Mary Piepho, Jerry McNerney and John Garamendi have been proposing all along!

water http://www.sacbee.com/2014/08/28/6662668/epa-says-californias-delta-water.html

Almonds versus the Drought

Good Op Ed in the SF Chronicle today by C-WIN’s Carolee Krieger making the link between the almond growing craze and the Monterey Plus Amendments, which eliminated the urban preference in times of drought and turned the Kern Water Bank over to the Resnicks.

She writes: “We need equitable policies that accommodate ratepayers, the environment and sustainable agriculture. It must be noted that industrial almond production is not sustainable in the arid San Joaquin Valley.

“We, the public, can reclaim our water, but we must break the unholy alliance between Sacramento and the San Joaquin agribusiness cabal. It may be 2014, but our water policies remain rooted in the 19th century. It is high time we brought them up to date.”

Read the entire article here: http://www.sfgate.com/opinion/openforum/article/Why-almonds-cover-California-5655309.php

STCDA Submits Formal Comments on the BDCP EIR/EIS

Save the California Delta Alliance’s legal council, Michael Brodsky, submitted formal comments on the Draft Bay Delta Conservation Plan, the Draft Environmental Impact Statement / Environmental Impact Report and the Draft Implementation Agreement.

To view the comments, click on the right-hand panel under “BDCP Formal Comments” or click here.

We thank Michael Brodsky for his tireless efforts in working to defeat the Peripheral Tunnels!

MBrodskySpeaker
Legal Council Michael Brodsky speaking out at BDCP meeting in Sacramento

Last day for BDCP Comments

Tomorrow, July 29, is the last day to send in your BDCP “Stop the Tunnels” comments. See our Take Action page for sample comments.

General directions for making comments: You may type your comment in the body of the email or you may provide the comment as an attachment to the email.

Start with a personal note (so they know you are a real person, not a robot) and tell how this tunnel project will affect you.

If you send the comment as an attachment, save it as a pdf file and attach the pdf file.

Note: BDCP Transparency Concern and inability to verify if your comment was received – At the start of the comment period, the BDCP took down their page where comments were posted. This is a very unusual action and brings into strong question their commitment to transparency. This also means you cannot check to see if your comment was received. If you want, send a CC to our email at NoDeltaGates below and thus we will have a copy to verify comments were sent.

Email to:
BDCP.Comments@noaa.gov

Optional (if you want a copy for verification – this is not the official site.)
Send CC: BDCP.Comments.COPY@nodeltagates.com.

You may make several comments in one email or you can send several emails, each with one or two comments. You can send comments in – as many and as often as you like.

If you prefer regular mail,
Mail to:
BDCP Comments
Ryan Wulff, NMFS
650 Capitol Mall, Suite 5-100
Sacramento, CA 95814

Invasive Weed Meeting Tuesday July 8 6:30 PM

*** REMINDER *** Delta Weed Meeting Tomorrow, Tuesday July 8, 6:30 PM in the DB Elementary School Gymnasium.

I’ve heard of bays where boaters can’t get out, families can’t use their back yard waterways for swimming and fun plus sales are being impacted. This problem isn’t limited to Discovery Bay – our Bethel Island neighbors and marinas throughout the Delta are struggling. Yet the Division of Boating and Waterways recently announced they weren’t going to spray this year.

Assemblymember Jim Frazier is bringing the Division of Boating & Waterways reps to talk to us about their invasive aquatic weed abatement plans (or lack thereof). In addition biologists will be on hand to discuss the invasive species and methods of management.

It looks to be an important and informative meeting plus hopefully enough people will attend to demonstrate that there really is a problem this year.

California Water Mismanagement

Gene Beley comments on Dan Batcher’s article and thinks it doesn’t go far enough. He adds

“Not enough is written about the mismanagement of California water and how they practically gave away the Kern Water Bank. It is now in the hands of private individuals like Stewart and Linda Resnick, billionaires who live in the largest mansion in Beverly Hills. They have mega-wealthy partners in that enterprise like Silicon Valley real estate developer, John Vidovich, who sold some of his water several years ago for a cool $77 million. Another partner is the Tejon Ranch Corp., who needs water to build a new city in the desert. These people don’t like you to know their names and Resnicks are famous for not giving interviews. This fact, coupled with the reservoirs are mostly nearly full in Southern California, is part of this non-fiction story being written into California history. Some predict if the twin tunnels get built, we’ll eventually see a dry Sacramento River. BDCP’s reports do say it will lower it at least by three feet. That impact alone would have dire consequences throughout the Delta. As many try to warn, you can’t fix the Delta by taking away fresh water from it. ”

To see Gene’s entire comment, go to https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2014/05/05/18755355.php?show_comments=1#comments


Pyramid Lake, LA, at the height of the drought. April 2014. Nearly 100% full

BDCP Comment Period ending June 13

June 13 is the end of BDCP EIR/EIS comment period. Dan Batcher in the Indy Bay Times today said “State officials are banking on the fact that the general public is too confused or not interested to voice any comment on this boondoggle until it’s too late. The public cannot sit quietly and watch this happen without at least voicing our concerns.”

Go to our Take Action tab which includes suggested comments and backup information from the Town Hall Meeting.

Email to:
BDCP.Comments@noaa.gov

Optional (if you want a copy for verification – this is not the official site.)
Send CC: BDCP.Comments.COPY@nodeltagates.com.

You may make several comments in one email or you can send several emails, each with one or two comments. You can send comments in – as many and as often as you like.

If you prefer regular mail,
Mail to:
BDCP Comments
Ryan Wulff, NMFS
650 Capitol Mall, Suite 5-100
Sacramento, CA 95814

Plus here’s a way to get even more information – a comment-writing party May 13th being offered by Restore the Delta. The event will run from 6:00-8:00 p.m. at the Reserve at Spanos Park, Mt. Diablo Room 6301 W. Eight Mile Rd. in Stockton. Refreshments will be provided. RSVP and letter writing information, language translators or childcare can be arranged: contact stina@restorethedelta.org or call (209) 475-9550. (RSVP is encouraged, but not required.) More info about it here.

Comments Due on the 3 Dams by April 16

Plans are moving forward to approve putting rock dams in three sloughs: False River (just west of Franks Tract and the typical navigation route for boats traveling from the South Delta to San Francisco), Sutter Slough and Steamboat Slough (in the North Delta). These would impact boating and navigation. Worse, they are being proposed by the water contractors to enable them to continue to over-export water south.

Opinions about the dams vary. There is a chance the False River one could actually help water quality in the South Delta. However, there are more that have negative opinions:

  1. They could (to me, it seems likely) become permanent. They definitely will be full-time over this summer since they are rock dams, not like the previously proposed opening gates.
  2. They are not planned to be fully removed. The wing dams on the side will remain. What will that do to the water flow during high tides? Will it be safe to boat through?
  3. There is a massive hyacinth/egeria densa problem in the Delta that is caused by low water flows. Frank’s Tract could become a meadow if the water flow is tampered with. Marinas are already having to spend millions of dollars of their own money to control invasive plants. If there are dams on Steamboat and Sutter Sloughs, the hyacinth problem there will be horrendous as there will be little or no water flow.
  4. This will have a negative effect on boating all over the area. False River is a well used navigable waterway as are Steamboat and Sutter Sloughs. The boating and marina industry is already suffering in the Delta along with restaurants and resorts.
  5. I worry that the barriers are part of the overall plan to “wall in” the delta and create a pipeline from Sacramento to the Forebay to export water south. These dams are 3 of a dozen or so that were seen on the BDCP maps in 2009 as part of the “through-the-Delta” peripheral canal plan.

UPDATED April 14, 2014: There’s a different email address than the one sent out previously:

SUBMITTING COMMENTS: Written comments, referencing Public Notice SPK-2014-00187 must be submitted to the office listed below on or before April 16, 2014.

Bill Guthrie, Project Manager
US Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District
1325 J Street, Room 1350
Sacramento, California 95814-2922
Email: William.H.Guthrie@usace.army.mil

The Corps is particularly interested in receiving comments related to the proposal’s probable impacts on the affected aquatic environment and the secondary and cumulative effects. Anyone may request, in writing, that a public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests shall specifically state, with particularity, the reason(s) for holding a public hearing. If the Corps determines that the information received in response to this notice is inadequate for thorough evaluation, a public hearing may be warranted. If a public hearing is warranted, interested parties will be notified of the time, date, and location. Please note that all comment letters received are subject to release to the public through the Freedom of Information Act. If you have questions or need additional information please contact the applicant or the Corps’ project manager Bill Guthrie, 916-557-5269, William.H.Guthrie@usace.army.mil.

(Old information below)

If you have concerns about these dams, send your comments in to Zachary.M.Simmons@usace.army.mil, or by telephone at 916-557-6746.

The original Army Corps of Engineers notice is provided below.

——– Original message ——–
From: “Imamura, Eileen R SPK”
Date:04/01/2014 3:07 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: “Simmons, Zachary M SPK”
Subject: Public Notice SPK-2014-00187 – Emergency Drought Barriers project (UNCLASSIFIED)

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District has posted Public Notice SPK-2014-00187 to http://www.spk.usace.army.mil/Media/RegulatoryPublicNotices.aspx

The California Department of Water Resources has applied for a permit to place dredged or fill material in approximately 3.89 acres (0.75 acre permanent and 3.15 acres temporary) of waters of the United States to construct three temporary salinity barriers. Proposed barriers would be located in Sutter Slough, approximately 1.25 miles downstream of the Sacramento River, Steamboat Slough, approximately 0.95 miles downstream of the Sacramento River, and False River, approximately 0.4 miles east of the San Joaquin River.

Written comments and/or a request for a paper copy of the notice may be submitted to project manager Zachary Simmons, by mail at 1325 J Street, Room 1350, Sacramento, California 95814-2922, by email at Zachary.M.Simmons@usace.army.mil, or by telephone at 916-557-6746.

Comments must be received by April 16, 2014.volunteers@nodeltagates.com?subject=I want to get on the bus!
&body=I want to go to Sacramento July 17th! My Name: Address: Phone#:” =”

Eileen Imamura
Administrative Officer, Regulatory Division
US Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District
1325 J Street, Room 1350, Sacramento, CA 95814-2922
916-557-5262 FAX: 916-557-7803
Eileen.R.Imamura@usace.army.mil

Let us know how we’re doing. Please complete the survey at: http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=regulatory_survey

Information on the Regulatory Program.
http://www.spk.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory.aspx

Regulatory Public Notices: http://www.spk.usace.army.mil/Media/RegulatoryPublicNotices.aspx

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE


Blog Stats

  • 126,300 hits

Support the STCDA

Sign up for Emails

Sign Up Now

Request a New Lawn Sign

Click Here to send an email to the lawn sign committee.

Receive news blog via email.

More Blogs

Educational Books about the Delta

Sassy the Salmon
and
The Fable of the Farmer and the Fish
All ages: K and above
Proceeds go to STCDA