Archive for the 'STCDA News' Category



The Trump Administration wants to send more water South to the Farmers

PLEASE SEND IN COMMENTS BY FEBRUARY 1

The USBR (the agency responsible for operating the Central Valley Project Delta exports to the almond farmers) is being asked to make changes to the Delta export operations or other alternatives to increase water; and are asking for comments. Notice of Intent.

DATES:
Submit written comments on the scope of the EIS by February 1, 2018.

ADDRESSES:
Send written comments to:

    • Katrina Harrison, Project Manager, Bureau of Reclamation, Bay-Delta Office, 801 I Street, Suite 140, Sacramento, CA 95814-2536

FAX to (916) 414-2425;

EMAIL: Click here to send your email to kharrison@usbr.gov with a BCC to our STCDA Comment File bdcp.commments.copy@nodeltagates.com.

SUGGESTED COMMENTS (PLEASE PICK YOUR IMPORTANT ONES AND REVISE TO YOUR OWN WORDING):

HIGHLY recommend that the first action should be to consider other alternatives to generate additional water or that improve and optimize the utilization of water such as desalinization, recycling, water conservation, or water reuse.

o HIGHLY recommend actions that could clean up the farm waste water from the Central Valley farms that now flows into the San Joaquin, which makes that river polluted and is why the farmers now want the Sacramento River water instead.

○ TENTATIVELY support Habitat restoration and ecosystem improvement projects, but only IF IN ADDITION to increased through-delta flows, not in place of. While such projects may aid fish populations, fish cannot be saved without increasing the flow. The BDCP habitat projects conducted over the past years show that, while some have minor positive impacts and other have no impacts, none were significantly beneficial. Whereas increased flow has been shown to immediately improves fish populations.

○ When considering if any actions are possible that increase export capabilities through the Delta, STRONGLY OPPOSE any new gates, dams, or other obstructions in the Delta waterways. Projects such as the 2-Gates Fish Protection Project violate The Rivers and Harbors Act, destroy boating, and thus ruin the economy of boating communities.

STRONGLY OPPOSE making any modifications to the current environmental and regulatory requirements that would negatively impact the fish or increase salinity.

STRONGLY OPPOSE any modifications to operations that reduce rather than increase the flow through the Delta.

o HIGHLY RECOMMEND other alternative actions OUTSIDE the Delta, that would REDUCE RELIANCE on the Delta and DECREASE EXPORT levels, thus better meeting the Delta Flow Requirements.
FOR EXAMPLE:

○ Restoring the Tulare Lake Basin for increased storage capacity south of the Delta and as percolation ponds to restore ground water.
o Improved ground water storage and better ground water management including more controlled management of the Kern Water Bank, which now is privatized and reportedly was used for personal watering of orchards and reselling water to urban developers.

Whatever is done, REQUEST that the USBR identify water quality standards that must be maintained, in various parts of the Delta (including the Discovery Bay waterways, where flow is limited due to drought years and other stressors) to be sure any changes improve, and don’t degrade, water quality and health. During the drought, we suffered from toxic blue-green algae blooms, which shut down our waterways to swimming and contact and significantly impacted our economy. Home sales fell through and marina businesses suffered. Ask them to please commit that any operational changes keep the health and safety of Delta communities.

How can I Find out More about the Delta?

To those of us who live on the Delta, boat on the Delta, or did in the past, the California Delta is indeed a special place. But how can other people, who don’t know anything about the Delta, learn more?

From its quaint historic communities in the North to its waterways perfect for wakeboarding, waterskiing, and other forms of water-based recreation in the South, the Delta offers a wide range of wonderful outdoor opportunities.

There’s bass fishing, with big tournaments held on Bethel Island every weekend during the season.

There’s the community of Discovery Bay, where over 2,000 homes are situated on manmade bays carved out of the San Joaquin River with docks and boats in their back yards. People are seen paddle boarding, kayaking, or just taking a sunset wine cruise around the bays with their friends.

And, of course, on January 1st, there’s the Frozen Bun Run from Rusty Porthole on Bethel Island, where tons of people gather in the morning to drink warm coffee and watch the participants in the Bun Run to ski on the very cold water in the very cold air and compete for the best costume, oldest skier, youngest skier, and yes, the least costume skier. Rollicking fun is had by all, and the Sheriff and Coast Guard are on hand to make sure the frozen skiers get back to the dock safely where a warm shower awaits them.

Yes, for those of us who know about the California Delta, it is a place near and dear to our hearts.

But what about those of you who know nothing about the Delta? The communities in the Delta are fighting hard against the California “WaterFix” (aka the Delta Tunnels) and other projects that threaten our communities, our waterways, and our way of life. Why are we fighting so hard? Why do we love the Delta?

On an iHeartRadio radio interview I was on last week, the radio host, Kevin Fox, asked me how people who don’t know about the Delta could learn more.

I’ve been thinking about it. Here’s two great ways to learn more:

On the Water Tours:
CptMorgan
CptMorgan-2.png

Captain Morgan has regular boat cruises throughout the Delta. You can pick a short cruise, a tailored cruise, etc. These are educational. Some are even overnight. His boat, the RoseMarie, is a large, comfortable houseboat. To check out the on-wanter experience to find out about the Delta, click here:
Captain Morgan Adventures (on the RoseMarie). If you do a tour that includes the Discovery Bay waterways, you may go by my back deck. I’ll wave 🙂

Another experience is to visit the quaint historical communities of the Northern Delta.
DeltaHeartbeatTours
DeltaHeartbeatTours-2.png

For that, the best way is a land tour put on regularly by Delta Heartbeat Tours and affiliated with the North Delta C.A.R.E.S. non-profit organization. Delta Heartbeat Tours. Some tours also include wine tasting.

I highly recommend both.

Radio Podcast about the Delta

iHeartRadio
Kevin Fox on iHeartRadio devoted a half-hour of his iHeartRadio show to the Delta last Wednesday. Listen to the iHeartRadio interview on-line here.

I’ve never been on a live radio show before (it was kind of scary, but Kevin made it easy). Kevin devoted the entire half hour so I definitely appreciate him doing that!

We covered everything from the Franks Tract project (not a good project), STCDA’s legal “Stay” against the Water Board for apparently rigging the WaterFix (Delta Tunnels) hearings (bad), and Gov. Brown’s new one-tunnel versus two tunnel plan (still bad). Kevin is a member of a sailing club that holds a regatta on Franks Tract, and the Delta is near and dear to his heart.

As, of course, it is to me and all of our STCDA members.

I thank him for his support . . .

    Jan McCleery, President
    Save the California Delta Alliance

On the News


CBS 13 News reported last night the allegation that the WaterFix has been rigged: http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/video/category/news/3794498-new-allegations-question-california-waterfix-project/

UPDATE: Water Board Delays Hearings

The State Water Resource Control Board sent out a notice today that they are delaying the start of their Part II Hearings due to our request for continuance (because we are alleging that the Part I Hearings were rigged):

    On January 12, 2018, Save the California Delta Alliance, et al. (SCDA) submitted a motion to continue Part 2 of the hearing for 90 days to allow “reformation” of the hearing to address ex parte communications between State Water Board staff and DWR, which SCDA alleges were unlawful. Subsequently, on January 15, 2018, the County of Sacramento, et al. submitted a similar motion seeking an indefinite continuance of Part 2 of the hearing to allow an investigation of the full extent of ex parte communications. Numerous parties joined in both motions.

    The hearing officers have directed the WaterFix hearing team to advise the parties that the hearing days scheduled for January 18 through February 1, 2018, are cancelled to give the hearing officers time to review all four motions. Unless the hearing officers notify the parties of any additional changes to the hearing schedule, the parties should assume that Part 2 of the hearing will resume on February 2, 2018 with policy statements only. Unless rescheduled the evidentiary portion of Part 2 will resume on February 5, 2018.

This will be interesting. I blogged about it today: https://nodeltagates.com/2018/01/17/breaking-news-waterfix-hearings-rigged/

Breaking News: WaterFix Hearings Rigged

 

lady-justice Breaking News: STCDA alleges that the Water Board Hearings on the WaterFix were rigged. These Hearings decide if the DWR gets their permit to start building the “WaterFix” Delta Tunnels.

What did these State agencies do wrong? STCDA alleges that ex-parte (illegal) meetings were conducted, in secret, between the Water Board and the Department of Water Resources (DWR). The Water Board is like the “judge” in these Hearings whereas the DWR is requesting the permit, i.e., the “plaintiff.” However, the two groups held 9 meetings over 13 months where they were collaborating about the Hearing. This is like the Judge and the plaintiff’s council colluding while a trial was underway. Ex-parte communications are illegal and mean that the entire Hearing is tainted.

Tell me more. During these secret meetings, the Water Board gave guidance to the DWR on what modeling and other evidence the DWR should prepare and present to back their claims at the Hearings; i.e., what information would be allowed or not allowed into the record during the actual hearings.

This was all kept secret? Mr. Brodsky states that he was recently informed by Nichole Kuenzi, the attorney for the Water Board, that “at the conclusion of each of the in-person meetings DWR personnel swept up all of the materials and took them back to DWR headquarters. Ms. Kuenzi informed us that DWR personnel were scrupulous about collecting all of the materials and not allowing Hearing Team members or other non-DWR personnel to retain any of the materials. To any neutral observer it is hard to find any explanation for this behavior other than a conscious attempt to cover up wrongdoing by hoarding evidence where it cannot be easily found.”

Wow! What does the DWR admit their wrong-doing? Mr. Brodsky made the PRA request last week for those meeting materials to be presented. So far the DWR has been strangely silent…

What does it mean? Since the entire hearing may have been compromised, all of the modeling and flow information is suspect and defendants like STCDA and others who participated in these Hearings arguing against the tunnels were not given due process. “No one can believe we got a fair shake,” says Brodsky. “The entire Hearing has been tainted.”

What is STCDA recommending? STCDA requests a 90-day continuance to the start of Part II of the Hearings (scheduled Thursday January 18); disqualifying the current hearing team members and appointing an impartial administrative law judge to re-hear all those objections; removing the DWR’s delta flow criteria from the Water Board’s evidentiary hearing and including it instead with the Bay Delta Water Quality Control Plan update; or dismissing the DWR’s of the petition for the Permit to be resubmitted later.

Anything else? Numerous other counties, water agencies and environmental groups, are expected to file additional joiners, given these findings made by Mr. Brodsky.

The full text of theSTCDA “MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARINGS FOR 90 DAYS” is here.

See also: <a href=""https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/1/16/1733262/-Breaking-Delta-Tunnels-Opponents-File-Motion-to-Stay-California-WaterFix-HearingDaly Kos article by Dan Bacher, “Delta Tunnels Opponents File Motion to Stay California WaterFix Hearing”.

We know the State’s Priorities

State Agencies and Officials Continue to Prioritize Almonds over Delta Communities and Fish

In a new report on the Oroville Dam failure, reported in the SacBee: Farms’ water was a concern in Oroville Dam’s spillway crisis, DWR and State Officials were accused of favoring the needs of the Central Valley almond farmers over the safety of Northern Californians: i.e., the state’s desire to continue shipping water to faraway farms and cities that rely on deliveries from the reservoir guided decisions that led to the evacuation of the city of Oroville.

Oroville-area elected officials and community leaders have long argued that the safety and well-being of locals who live in the shadow of the dam is a secondary priority to the DWR.

A “Franks Tract Feasibility Study” is being conducted by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife continues that trend. Here’s the link to take a survey about Franks Tract: Franks Tract Feasibility Study Link. The project would help the exporters continue to export at the current high levels or higher, but would ruin the community of Bethel Island economically and destroy the largest bass fishing area in Northern California. Once again, the trade-off is exporters versus Northern California and it’s Northern California that loses. In addition, we noticed that the project will require a large amount of fill. Suspiciously, we think, “Hummmm – the State needs a plan for where to dump tunnel muck” (which they renamed “Reusable Tunnel Material”, but muck by any other name is still muck). How much of this project is being pushed forward to solve a big part of that problem?

Meanwhile the Delta Smelt struggle to survive. (LA Times Article The delta smelt heads for extinction, marking a half-century of failed California water policy). Only two smelt were found in the latest California fish population survey. That’s a far cry from the peak of 1,673 in 1970. We are about to see the extinction of a fish species for the first time since the Endangered Species Act came into existence in 1973.

Of course, the bigger concern is not about the tiny Delta smelt for itself, but because its health is an indicator of the overall health of the delta ecosystem – it is the canary in the mine and the mine is toxic. The extinction of the smelt will be a complete failure of a half-century’s statewide water policy.

But the fate of the smelt itself is a distraction; the real issue is the fate of the Delta, says the article. And the decline of the smelt tells us it’s in trouble. While it’s true that agricultural production in Tulare and Kern counties, which receive water from the delta, is valued at more than $13 billion a year, that has to be weighed against other values needing to be preserved. They include the value of Delta farming, commercial and sport fisheries, the health of its residents and their property values.

Time to call or write the Governor and legislature representatives?
Tell them:

  • The people of California want state and federal government entities to immediately start investing time and money taking steps that could truly save the Delta Smelt and the entire Delta ecosystem: namely, to stop violation of the Delta Reform Act of 2009 and instead begin reducing the levels of exports and commit that all future water solutions MUST reduce reliance on the Delta.

  • The tunnels will NOT save the Delta – The tunnels will NOT save the Delta smelt, and if no other solutions are pursued, the Delta smelt will be the first fish species to have gone extinct since the Endangered Species Act was signed into law in 1973. And that signals the destruction of the entire Delta and everyone that relies on it.

  • Stop spending money on projects and studies like the Franks Tract Feasibility Study that only assist the exporters and not the Delta – that don’t help the communities, fish, Delta farmers, and others that rely on the Delta.

Governor Jerry Brown
(916) 445-2841
E-mail

Senator Diane Feinstein
Washington D.C. (202) 224-3841
District Offices: (310) 914-7300, (415) 393-0707, (559) 485-7430
E-mail

Senator Kamala Harris
Washington D.C. (202) 224-3553
District Offices: (213) 894-5000, (415) 355-9041, (559) 497-5109
E-mail

Franks Tract Feasibility Study

ADDED 1/24/2018: Take the Franks Tract Survey.

I was invited to attend a meeting at the San Joaquin Yacht Club last week about a new “Franks Tract Feasibility Study.” There were many Bethel Islanders representing marina owners, restaurant owners, realtors, Bethel Island Municipal Improvement District (BIMID) representatives, Bradford Island landowners, and others. It was a good turn-out.

The presentation was by Carl Wilcox, California Department of Fish & Wildlife (CDFW). He was accompanied by two UC Davis researchers working on the project: Brett Milligan and Alejo Kraus-Polk. Their role includes gathering community feedback.

It was nice that this project is working to obtain information from the affected groups early in the process. This is the study phase. Apparently it started earlier in 2017. The Study Report is due March or April this year. $400K has been spent on the Study to-date.

Here’s the plan (the figure on the right). It shows a tidal barrier down the middle of Franks Tract and filling the west side of Franks Tract and Little Franks Tract with fill dirt to make it tidal marsh at high tide, dirt at low tide. They would add a dam on False River midway (top right on their figure). This would be instead of a dam on the west side of False River where it joins the San Joaquin which was done a few years ago. There were numerous problems with that dam.

Note: That dam means, like when the prior False River Dam was installed, boats from Discovery Bay and elsewhere South/West would not be able to use the route north of Franks Tract via False River to the San Joaquin Channel to go to Pittsburg, Benicia, or San Francisco but instead would have to go the long way straight up to the Channel via Old River and follow the Channel out.

The drawing on the left is my “creation” to try to show the size of the fill versus Franks Tract as it is now.

The project write-up is:

    The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) is working on a feasibility study for a project that would fill certain portions of Frank and Little Franks Tract to create tidal wetlands and control salinity intrusion into the inner Delta. Modifications would occur on the western side of Franks Tract, above Piper slough and between Bethel Island and Webb Tract, and in the confluence of False River and Fishermen’s cut. Much of this area is currently dominated by shallow water and snags, and is a known boating hazard.


    Preliminary biological objectives for the project include enhancing habitat for Delta Smelt and other (native) fish species, minimizing habitat for invasive plant species, and the establishment of 1000 acres of tidal marsh and tidal sloughs. Preliminary physical objectives include changing tidal circulation to more closely resemble historic conditions, eliminating tidal flow and limiting salinity movement through Franks into Old River, and enhancing turbidity and residence time in False River and areas west of Franks. Navigability through Fishermen’s cut, False River, and Piper slough will not be affected, however, hydrodynamic modeling predicts increased tidal action in Fishermen’s cut although not to the extent seen with the emergency drought barrier. This proposed project differs from previous projects in its attention to the concerns of boaters and the Bethel Island community.

If this concerns you, here’s a survey they would like boaters and fishermen who go to Franks Tract to fill out: Franks Tract Survey.

Issues are that it would block boating from the South/East Delta through False River and out, and through Franks Tract to Bethel Island marinas and restaurants. Boats wanting to go to Rusty Porthole for dinner, Sugar Barge, Russo’s, Piper Point (the old Bethel Harbor), plus all of the homeowners and others would need to travel all the way via the 5 MPH Piper Slough.

Naturally, the plan raised lots of consternation from Bethel Island folks. Every weekend Bethel Island holds bass fishing tournaments, bringing in an average of $200K per event. The fishermen come directly in to the event (typically held at Sugar Barge or Russo’s) directly from Frank’s Tract (fast water) through one of the breaks in the levee outside those establishments. Asking fast fishing boats to take the very long way up Piper Slough would definitely cause the events to be held elsewhere. It would impact if not close business at Rusty Porthole, home of the January 1st Frozen Bun Run. You can’t have a Frozen Bun Run ski tournament if you have to first toodle down 20-30 minutes of 5 MPH zone to get to fast water.

The majority of boats the visit Bethel Island cut across Franks Tract. With this project, that would be closed off, losing their participation in Delta-wide events like Big Cat Poker runs and the like.

And what about bass fishing? Bethel Island is renown, not just in the Delta but throughout the U.S., as the top bass fishing area in the country. Striped bass and black bass events are huge. Bass also contributes significantly to the economy of Northern California – think of all the bass fishing boats we see zipping around continually. Boat sales, equipment, clothing, etc. are a big industry, as I found out at the Simm’s Bass Fishing event at Sugar Barge late last year. The bass fishermen say this project would basically kill bass fishing.

Carl Wilcox and his team had also met with the West Delta Chapter of the California Striped Bass Association December 15th and Roger Mammon reported that “We were unanimous in that it would destroy one of the best Striped Bass fishing areas in the Delta as well as the world class black bass fishery. We concluded this meeting expressing our doubts about this project due to all the potential negative impacts for our Delta and the East County economy.”

While it was nice that CDFG is trying to get local feedback, it did feel like other State projects where they collect comments and feedback but then those don’t influence the project significantly (aka the “WaterFix” or Delta Tunnel plan).

The “Franks Tract Feasibility Study” has two stated goals: Block salinity intrusion and improve habitat for Delta Smelt. Are either of these goals truly to improve the Delta? The real answer would be “No.” The project would ruin the community of Bethel Island economically and destroy the largest bass fishing area in Northern California. After all, Franks Tract has been named a “State Recreational Area.” (Attendees asked why a representative from Parks and Recreation wasn’t in attendance).

The Bethel Island attendees asked Wilcox why the focusing on Delta Smelt and he answered truthfully, because the smelt were the reason for environmentalists to keep shutting down the pumps. The other purpose, to stop salinity intrusion, is also because they plan to continue to over-export and allow salt water to intrude beyond the point the State committed to, the X2 line near Pittsburg. Franks Tract is way further inland than Pittsburg.

The obvious take-away is that we have the State working on yet another project, not due to concerns about the Delta as an ecosystem but with the sole purpose of allowing the exporters to continue to export water from the Delta at the current high levels or higher.

In addition, we noticed that the project will require a large amount of fill. Suspiciously, we think, “Hummmm – the State is getting pushback on not having a plan for where to dump tunnel muck,” (which they renamed “Reusable Tunnel Material,” but muck by any other name is still muck). How much of this project is being pushed forward to solve a big part of that problem? Having worked with State agencies for years and watching them push for the Delta tunnels, and knowing they currently have a problem with permits because they don’t have sufficient plans in place for how they will dispose of the tunnel muck and at what cost, having 1,000 acres to dump 5-10 feet high with tunnel muck would significantly help them out.

An alternative proposal was offered by Bethel Island resident David Gloski, who holds an undergraduate engineering degree from MIT and a masters degree. His proposal is a true compromise, that would meet their stated goals of salinity barrier and smelt habitat but would not do as much harm to their community, to the bass fishing industry, and would actually improve boating and access. A real win-win.

FranksTractAlt

The alternate creates three tidal marshes, “A”, “B”, and “C”. There are areas that are already somewhat filled with vegetation and not fished as extensively. Then a tidal wall would be constructed in the middle as shown with an optional additional extension “V” if needed. “W” is the existing island which could be built out and improved for access and recreational use. “X”, “W”, and “Z” indicate beach areas and anchor buoys. The proposal includes dredging on the west side to improve boating access through Franks Tract and reduce the number of snags and boat issues. It would also create a new anchorage; a much-needed South Delta recreational area, since Horseshoe Bend south of Bethel Island has issues with snags getting in/out of it which leaves Mildred as the only South Delta anchorage. Mildred is losing its beaches (I’d love to see the State add more beaches there), but this proposal would be a good option! This proposal still leaves fast water access available to the marinas and restaurants.

Wilcox declined to commit to adding it to their study. He only said he would “see . . ” if they could model it as part of the study.

They also said there was a “Dutch Slough Project that is about to begin construction in Oakley. I don’t know what that is. I guess I have more research to do.

Happy New Year

Dear STCDA Member –

Thank you for being a loyal member of Save the California Delta Alliance and helping in the fight to protect the California Delta. We appreciate your support in our continued grassroots advocacy to Save the Delta. Our goal: to provide a healthy environment where fish and wildlife can thrive, with fresh water for the Delta farms, and waterways that Delta communities, boaters, and visitors can continue to enjoy.

Policymakers do best when they know what their constituents expect. STCDA members were very active this year. You wrote to your representatives, took the bus to Sacramento, and showed up at hearings, workshops, and meetings to demand that the State policymakers step up to their responsibilities in protecting the Delta. Our legislators responded, with Jerry McNerney proposing his WEST Act in Congress, and Assemblyperson Jim Frazier established the Delta Caucus to push legislatively against the tunnels. Frazier was joined by other Northern California legislators including Sen. Glazer who spoke at our Town Hall. Having your representatives come to our Town Hall Meetings where 400-500 of you show up makes a big impact in motivating them to act in our behalf.

The Delta was plagued again this year by toxic algae and the fish populations remain at risk. The tunnels would increase those issues significantly. Next year is Governor Brown’s last year in office, and he is increasing his push for the tunnels. We are continuing to push back. When the policymakers ignore the law and our rights and move ahead, we must then take the next step and prepare legal contest, using your donations (thank you!) to hire expert witnesses to back our claims.

2018 will be a critical year in the battle. We need your help again to support our goal.

Please consider making a year-end contribution to support STCDA. With your support we can continue to be your grassroots voice for the Delta.

Peace to you and your family during this holiday season and into the new year.

Sincerely,

Jan McCleery
President, STCDA

Happy Holidays 2017 – The Year in Review

stcda-holidays

Here’s the year in review. The picture version of our year is below. Enjoy!

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Hoping you all have a happy holiday season and find peace and joy in 2018! And that 2018 is the year we finally Stop the Tunnels!

If you would like to be part of the solution, to put the final nail in the coffin of the Delta Tunnels in 2018, please donate to Save the California Delta Alliance!


Having trouble? Click here

STCDA – HappyHolidays2017


Blog Stats

  • 127,225 hits

Support the STCDA

Sign up for Emails

Sign Up Now

Request a New Lawn Sign

Click Here to send an email to the lawn sign committee.

Receive news blog via email.

More Blogs

Educational Books about the Delta

Sassy the Salmon
and
The Fable of the Farmer and the Fish
All ages: K and above
Proceeds go to STCDA