Archive for the 'News and Events' Category



Time to Board the Buses!

At the Town Hall Meeting in February, everyone wanted to “get on the buses” to show Sacramento what we think about their Big Dumb Canal Plan (aka BDCP) – let’s do it at the next BDCP Public Meeting !!!

April 4th, 1:30 PM, Sacramento

We’ll organize car pools. We’ll look into getting buses.

We’ll be sending out more info – but wanted you to “Save the Date”.

BDCP Meeting Notice    1:30-4:30 pm at the Red Lion Woodlake Conference Center, 500 Leisure Lane, Sacramento. (Confirm meeting details and view agenda at the BDCP Website).

How about signs? Let’s make signs like “STOP THE TUNNELS RECALL BROWN”, “Big Dumb Concrete Pipes”, “SAVE THE DELTA STOP THE TUNNELS”. We’ll make some signs for people but anyone creative that wants to make their own, that would be great.

Please contact me if (1) you could drive in case we do car pools and (2) you can attend. I’ll start getting a headcount.

Bus to Sacramento

ToDo!!! Send comments to the State Water Board by March 29th

Is everyone just trying to confuse us??? Originally it sounded like the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB or commonly called the State Water Board) Substitute Environmental Document (SED) may be a good thing. At least reading their webpage.

Now we believe it’s a very bad thing from the reports of attendees at the March 20th public hearing. It sounds like the SWRCB is planning to reduce freshwater flows on the San Joaquin River (higher flows have been responsible for starting to improve the return of the salmon and help bring fresher water into the South Delta). In addition, they are raising the amount of salt allowed in the water – salt that gets into the tributaries from the South San Joaquin farms and then ruins Delta farmlands.
Spilled Salt

We need to say “NO!

Please email your comments by March 29th

Examples:

  • We need MORE fresh water released into the San Joaquin, not less. The State Water Board’s own Delta Flows report released in August 2010 called for more fresh water for the Delta!
  • We need LESS salt in the San Joaquin River for use by Delta farmers, not more! The Delta farmers have senior water rights. They deserve the freshest water first, not the South San Joaquin valley farmers who have junior water rights, many of whom are mega-corporations and should not be getting subsidized water, let alone the freshest water. It is those desert farmlands that leech out salts and selenium into the runoff water. Save the Delta farms!

Please send in comments (due March 29th).

SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS

Please include the subject line, “Comment Letter – Bay-Delta Plan SED.”

  • Via email: You may also submit your comments to Ms. Townsend by fax at (916) 341-5620, by email at
    commentletters@waterboards.ca.gov
  • Via snailmail addressed to:
      Jeanine Townsend
      Clerk to the Board
      State Water Resources Control Board
      P.O. Box 100
      Sacramento, CA 95814-0100

Details and Background

The State Water Board is in the final week of comments on its Substitute Environmental Document (SED).

The board’s webpage describes the SEP as proposed changes to the Bay-Delta Plan as:

  1. a new narrative February through June Lower San Joaquin River (LSJR) flow objective applicable to the salmon bearing tributaries to the LSJR (the LSJR, Merced, Tuolumne, and Stanislaus rivers) and an associated program of implementation to support and maintain the natural production of viable native LSJR watershed fish populations migrating through the Delta; and
  2. revised numeric southern Delta salinity objectives and an associated program of implementation to protect agricultural beneficial uses in the southern Delta.

Sounds like positive changes for the Delta – Yes?

HOWEVER, at the March 20 review meeting, it was reported by attendees there that “Westside San Joaquin Valley farmers throwing South Delta farmers under the bus” and saying that at the State Water Resources Control hearing on San Joaquin River Flows as part of the San Francisco Bay/Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Estuary (Bay-Delta) Program, Phase I, John Rubin, Senior Council for the San Luis Delta-Mendota Water Authority, made a presentation to the State Water Resources Control Board that was an all out attack on the future of farming for South Delta farmers. That the SED calls for 35% unimpaired flows on the San Joaquin River and a weakening of salinity and water quality standards in the South Delta from 0.7 e.c. to 1.0 e.c. (measurements of electrical conductivity used to measure salinity).

This would be a weakening of the standards, not improvements for fish and farmers as, it seems, misleadingly stated on the website.

Furthermore, it was reported that the weakening of standards was

    “not sufficient for San Luis Senior Council Jon Rubin. The bulk of his presentation was predicated on how salinity in the South Delta could be raised to 1.2 or 1.4 e.c., with Delta farmers, according to his science sources, suffering small crop losses. It certainly takes some gumption for Rubin, who represents several districts responsible for loading the San Joaquin River with salt, selenium, and boron and that are pushing for the construction of the peripheral tunnels so they can have the best in water quality and reliability, to expect South Delta farmers to be limited in crop choices and to experience losses in production levels.

    We believe that this is an alarm bell for all Delta and Northern California farmers. If Westside growers are willing to sacrifice senior water rights holders and fellow farmers in the South Delta today, they will come for every other farmers’ water rights and ability to remain productive tomorrow.”

Forum on Delta braces residents for battle against state water tunnel plan

By Paul Burgarino Contra Costa Times

DISCOVERY BAY — The future of the Delta hangs in the balance, and it will take an extensive grass-roots effort to stop state plans that would negatively alter its ecosystem.

That was the message relayed often Wednesday night to a capacity crowd of more than 200 concerned East Contra Costa residents who packed the Discovery Bay Elementary School gymnasium for a town hall forum.

Presented by environmental organization Save the California Delta Alliance, it featured updates on pressing Delta issues from Contra Costa Supervisor Mary Nejedly Piepho, of Discovery Bay, and Assemblyman Jim Frazier, D-Oakley, and what they are doing to curtail a plan that would divert water from the region.

Concerns center around Gov. Jerry Brown’s proposal to build a pair of 37-mile-long tunnels that would convey water from the Sacramento River south of Sacramento near Courtland to Clifton Court Forebay near Byron, bypassing the Delta.

The price tag is unknown, but estimates range from $14 billion to $20 billion. It also is uncertain who would pay for the project.

A draft of Brown’s plan, formally called the Bay Delta Conservancy Plan, is supposed to be released later this month, and environmental documents are slated to come later this year.

Residents opposed to the plan should weigh in early and often, as its approval would not require legislative oversight, said Michael Brodsky, legal counsel for the Delta Alliance.

“(The hearings) need to be like the Watergate hearings,” he said.

Tunnel proponents argue that it would provide water to needy residents in Southern California and farmers in the Central Valley, while being located farther upstream than past plans so the conveyance of Delta water wouldn’t bring salt water in from the bay and alter the ecosystem.

Local lawmakers and most at the meeting disagree.

“It sounds like we are going to be hosed,” said Discovery Bay resident Dana Matthews, adding it is the first time he had really paid attention to the issue. “It’s being disguised so it sounds like it makes environmental sense.”

Bethel Island resident and former harbor owner Richard Robertson said the only way to fight the idea is to air TV commercials in Southern California showing what environmental damage it would do.

Earlier this week, six U.S. representatives who serve the five counties that surround the Delta urged Department of the Interior Secretary Ken Salazar and Department of Commerce Acting Secretary Rebecca Blank to conduct a cost-benefit analysis of alternative proposals to the tunnel plan so they can receive equal consideration.

Rep. Jerry McNerney, D-Stockton, who wrote the letter, said in a news release that not looking at all alternatives is “irresponsible, risky, and a disservice to the taxpayers who will ultimately foot the bill.”

“To destroy one area of California and deprive people of the water resources that they desperately need is completely unacceptable,” he said.

Wednesday’s meeting concluded with a viewing of the film “Over Troubled Waters,” which documents how the estuary is threatened. The film was made by a group called Restore the Delta.

Alliance President Jan McCleery reminded the crowd that residents of Delta communities have rallied before to stop state projects “in their own backyard,” including putting two gates up to protect fish in 2009 and the original Peripheral Canal idea in 1982.

“This group really has a lot of power. Collectively, we can make a difference,” Piepho said.

Contact Paul Burgarino at 925-779-7164. Follow him at Twitter.com/paulburgarino.

Why isn’t anyone looking at desalinization as part of the plan?

Save the California Delta Alliance submitted a formal set of comments in response to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Delta Plan. A contingent of concerned citizens traveled to Sacramento Thursday January 24 to show their concern and present comments at the Delta Stewardship Council (DSC) hearing. We told them about our community and boating concerns and questioned why the DSC is not reviewing alternatives to the BDCP/Peripheral Canal.

Various alternatives have been proposed including Dr. Pyke’s concept for a new intake at Sherman Island or restructuring the current location with state-of-the-art fish screens. Or better still, options which avoid removing additional water from the Delta by leveraging the millions of acre feet of water now diverted into the flood control structures on the Sacramento River north of the proposed point of diversion or the Tulare Lake Basin Restoration proposals.

It seems obvious any alternative should include desalinization plants to improve regional self-sufficiency for the Central and Southern portions of the state.

The position the Delta Stewardship Council has taken is that they are responsible for guidelines protecting the Delta and the Bay and Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP) is responsible for the Tunnel project. The DSC says therefore they are only responsible for reviewing the BDCP proposal. That doesn’t make sense to us. That leaves no one in the state looking for better alternatives than exporting even more water out of the Delta after the current level of exports have sent the environment into crisis mode. The BDCP’s plan will increase salinity, deteriorate our water quality, impact the fish and waterfowl. We think the Council can and should evaluate the merits and feasibility of various options.

There are many options much better than huge twin tunnels. One of our Discovery Bay residents, a prior engineer, has offered a new variation that has some unique ideas. I think his ideas combine the best of the best solutions and would save our Delta from the damage we all know would result if the twin tunnels (aka Peripheral Canal) is built.

———————————————–
This is Eric Jensen from Discovery Bay.
My background is in Engineering with my last 20 years at Hewlett-Packard.

I have studied the water problem that faces California and have come up with a solution that will benefit all Californians.

Water solution:
1) Cancel the twin tunnels and instead spend the money to build large desalinization plants inland, close to the existing canal infrastructure. Run them full time, with the excess water being sold to Arizona and Nevada or even further inland.
2) Create water storage solutions for Southern and even Central California [Store excess in Lake Mead, restore the Tulare Lake Basin, replenish ground water]
3) Improve the existing pumps by installing numerous large self cleaning fish filters, saving millions of fish from death at the pumps. This type of filter already exists, you can see one in use near the intersection of Bixler and Denali in Discovery Bay or I can send you photos that I have taken.

Why this the best solution:
1) This eliminates the “all your eggs in one basket” twin tunnel concept, because it prevents the drought situation that is inevitable (look at Kansas wheat today or the Mayan civilization that perished in an extended drought).
2) Population throughout California will continue to increase, as will the need for water. We do not need a different distribution of the existing water, we need more water.
3) Allows for storage of excess water when California has an excess rainfall.

Results:
1) Yes, water will cost more, but the cost will be shared by all Californians not just those using the more expensive per acre foot desalinized water. Selling the excess water will lower Californians cost.
2) We have purchased an “insurance policy” that California will have water during drought, not just for now, but for it’s future generations.
3) With the improved fish filters, the existing pumps can safely send less expensive water south when water is available or to storage during excess years.
4) We have created more water, not fought over the distribution of existing water that will disappear in an extended drought that is inevitable.

Hope you like the concept, thanks,

Eric Jensen

—————————-
References:
Dr. Pyke’s Open Letter August 28, 2012
January 9, 2013 – Dr. Pyke’s Addendum to the Proposal

Lack of Alternatives being Considered

One of the big complaints of the Delta Plan and related processes for “fixing” the Delta is the lack of alternatives being evaluated and presented.

The current plan being advocated by Gov. Brown and the BDCP is the huge massive twin tunnels to export 4 million gallons of water per hour from the Sacramento River to send South which would move the water around the Delta instead of flowing through it. The amount of water the tunnels could remove is basically all of the fresh water from the Sacramento River which would leave the Delta farms and communities surrounded only by brackish, stagnant water – not exactly an environmentally friendly situation.

Mary Piepho, Contra Costa County Supervisor, expressed her concerns last week in a KCBS San Francisco Radio Interview.

Contra Costa Supervisor Worries Gov’s Plan Would Divert Too Much Water To SoCal


“Brown’s nearly $24 billion tunnel system would divert water from farmland and cities.” “They’re focusing on the delta specifically to resolve greater statewide problems. The delta simply does not have the supply, the capacity or the ecosystem to withstand that sort of pressure,” Piepho said. Click here to read the entire article and hear the radio interview first-hand.

This week environmental groups proposed an alternative to the two massive tunnels called the “‘Portfolio-Based’ Single Peripheral Tunnel Proposal” which would export less water than the BDCP plan and still pump some water from the existing Tracy pumps in the South Delta. While this does result in some fresh water flowing through the Delta, Save the California Delta Alliance (STCDA) does not deem that as a viable alternative since it means exporting more water from the already stressed Delta.

The Restore the Delta response to the Single Tunnel Proposal was “We maintain that the best way to restore the Delta is to improve levees to the highest standard, to add habitat to those wide upgraded levees, to restore flows in and through the Delta, to screen the existing pumps properly, in addition to promoting regional self-sufficiency for water development in other parts of the state. If the existing pumps at Tracy remain in use, and a 3000 cfs tunnel is added at Hood, the total export capacity from the Delta would remain at 6 million acre feet. You cannot restore the Delta by taking that much water out of it.”

STCDA response to the Delta Plan calls for the Delta Stewardship Council to consider other alternatives besides the massive tunnels which to-date have been the sole focus of Governor Brown and the BDCP. Thursday the Contra Costa County Supervisors formally called for a wider range of options to be studied.

There are better alternatives. STCDA suggests evaluating better use of spring water runoff, which now overflows into the Yolo Bypass and various Weirs and is not recovered, and instead piping it south to re-charge central valley aquifers. A new proposal has been suggested to build a reservoir on Sherman Island in the West Delta and pipe water from there to the Tracy pumps, thus allowing the fresh water to first flow through the Delta. Proposals have long existed to restore the Tulare Lake basin. And of course water conservation, retiring toxic farmlands that leach salt and selenium, and a plan for regional self-sufficiency seem like the most obvious first steps.

Destroying the Delta can’t be the only alternative for the state’s water issues.

Don’t forget to Save the Date for the STCDA Town Hall Meeting on Delta Water including a free showing of Restore the Delta’s acclaimed movie “Over Troubled Waters.”

Recent and Upcoming Events

Governor’s Big Mistake

Last week SFGate publishes article “Governor’s Delta Plan is a Big Mistake”.

It’s a great article. Concise. A must-read.

Delta Plan Comment Period Ends

Thanks to everyone who submitted comments to the Delta Plan! We all have concerns from making sure that our home values are protected, our boating access assured, local farmers and businesses are not impacted and the environment maintained.

STCDA’s legal council submitted Rulemaking comments for the Delta Plan finding the Delta Plan inadequate since it does not take account of the peripheral canal or provide the Council adequate criteria to assess the canal when it comes for approval and to insure adequate protection of the Delta after the canal goes into operation. Additional concerns are the Council’s decision to not study conveyance options/alternatives.

If the Delta Plan, which is supposed to be the regulatory document for Delta operations from now on, doesn’t consider the canal, which is the biggest threat to the Delta, then the Plan can’t be complete!

Lets Take our Message to the Delta Council!

Next week, Thursday January 24th is an important public hearing meeting for the Delta Stewardship Council to take additional public input on the Delta Plan Rulemaking procedures. STCDA representatives plan to attend and encourage all others who can to show up and demonstrate local concern for the Plan and process. Having faces in the room is a great way to make a strong impact! The meeting is from 9:30 – 11:30 AM at the Ramada Inn & Suites, 1250 Halyard Drive, West Sacramento, CA 95691 – see Delta Council public hearing. People are welcome to show up at the Boardwalk Grill 5879 Marina Road in Discovery Bay at 8 AM to grab a hot coffee and carpool together. See you there!


Carpool and Meeting Info

Delta Plan Comments due before January 14th

Don’t forget to submit any comments to the Delta Plan Final Draft before the January 14th deadline. Email your comments to deltaplancomment@deltacouncil.ca.gov. The PDF of the Final Plan is here. The website with all of the details and appendices is here.

The Plan has a lot of good information, clearly states the problems and issues facing the Delta today and recognizes the Delta as a “place” for communities, boating, and farming as well as being an important ecosystem. However for boaters, while it recognizes the value of boating to the Delta communities and all of Northern California, there is nothing that discussed boaters’ significant concerns and issues which would be caused by restricting navigation such as was planned for the Two Gates project.

In addition, a primary focus for “fixing” the Delta is “habitat restoration” – flooding Delta islands. However, the scientific reviews I have heard and read are concerned that there is no proof that flooding islands does help significantly and it reduces fertile farmland in order to send water to the desert Westland farms that leech selenium and other chemicals and toxic salts so they can expand growing water-intensive crops such as cotton and almond production for export. I for one am not excited to reduce our local wonderful produce in exchange for supporting the growing market for almonds and pistachios in China. I feel there aren’t enough restrictions and guidelines about exporting water and for what.

The comments I submitted are here in case they are useful: Jan’s Comments.

“Save the California Delta” Petition

On November 19th, a new petition was initiated by Jan McCleery of Discovery Bay to Save the California Delta because of concern about the ongoing progress towards a Peripheral Canal (aka Delta Tunnels) which local scientist know will cause the dismise of the Delta.

(Note: If you search on the SignOn site you will see two petitions with exactly the same name. Someone else started the second one yesterday – we are not sure if that person had good intentions or wants to divert signees. Be sure you use the link so you find the right petition so the community speaks with one voice and doesn’t end up divided.)

In July Governor Brown said they will build the Canal first, then figure out how to restore the Delta later. In October, Congressman Jerry McNerney, John Garamendi and other local legislators cosponsored H.R. 6484, the SAFE Levee Act, to push the need for a complete cost-benefit study on the impact of the Peripheral Tunnel proposal, which the state and federal governments have thus far refused to do.

The Delta Stewardship Council (DSC), Bay and Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP) and other well-funded efforts directed by the Governor continue to move forward in their drive to build a Peripheral Canal – a shortsighted alternative to solving California’s water issues.

Enough is enough. Recent news about on-line petitions garnering thousands of signees made me hopeful that the people against the Peripheral Canal can do the same to make our voices heard by signing Save the California Delta.

The Petition Statement is: We oppose Governor Brown’s push to build huge tunnels, estimated to cost up to $60 billion, to bypass the California Delta. The impacts to the fish, fertile Delta farmland, Delta economy and recreation in both the Delta and San Francisco Bays more than offset any benefits provided by the tunnels.

Petition Background: Help us save the California Delta – the largest freshwater estuary West of the Mississippi, critical to the Northern California environment (the most important biological asset on the west coast, home to 750 species of fish, birds and other animals), recreation, local Delta farmers and Delta economy. Water exports have increasingly affected Delta water quality, resulting in a salmon fishery closure in 2008/2009 with significant economic losses, all to benefit the desert farmland’s big agribusiness millionaires. I live on the Delta and love it – it’s my backyard. Current plans will cause the demise of salmon and other fish and fowl and will harm the Delta economy and the health and quality of Delta water.

MAKE SURE YOU SIGN THE RIGHT PETITION. SOMEONE ELSE STARTED A COMPETING PETITION ON THURSDAY WITH THE EXACT SAME PETITION NAME BUT THAT WILL DIVIDE OUR NUMBERS.

MAKE SURE YOU SIGN JAN McCLEERY’S Save the California Delta PETITION.

Over Troubled Waters

The Delta is still in danger, make no mistake, and it’s time to pay keen attention to what is happening.

Restore the Delta has created a new documentary “Over Troubled Waters” and showings began in September. It is narrated by Ed Begley, Jr. and is a MUST SEE. See http://overtroubledwaters.org/buy-tickets/ for upcoming show times and locations.

The next showing is Saturday October 6th in Brentwood, CA at 10:00 AM. A Question & Answer session follows at 11:15.

What: Over Troubled Waters
Doors open at 10:00am, Screening 10:30am, Q&A 11:15am
Where: Delta Cinema, 641 1st Street, Brentwood
When: Saturday, October 6, 2012

Tickets: ADMISSION TO THIS EVENT IS FREE, FIRST COME FIRST SEATED.

See Over Troubled Waters: Sustainable Water Advocates, Premiere Film on Water Wars for more information on the film.

See http://overtroubledwaters.org/buy-tickets/ for all show times and locations.

Some thoughts on the delta tunnels (Jon Carroll, SFGate)

Good SF Gate article in August, 2012:

“I cannot believe that Jerry Brown is trying to sell these delta tunnels as a really good idea. They’re not. Their potential for environmental damage is almost incalculable. The only good thing about them is that fracking is not involved.

“These tunnels are designed to move water across the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta area and away from the delta itself, which uses water to, like, produce rivers and streams and sloughs and marshes, all of them good for the ecosystem. It’s a fragile system at best, having survived various assaults on its integrity over the years, but this thing … you just know something is going to go wrong.

“And once it goes wrong, it’s going to be hard to stop. It’s hubris over common sense, an attempt to build our way out of a problem we can’t escape: too many people, too little water. That’s a problem now; that’ll be a problem if this multibillion-dollar boondoggle is ever finished.”

Read the entire article.


Blog Stats

  • 125,971 hits

Support the STCDA

Sign up for Emails

Sign Up Now

Request a New Lawn Sign

Click Here to send an email to the lawn sign committee.

Receive news blog via email.

More Blogs

Educational Books about the Delta

Sassy the Salmon
and
The Fable of the Farmer and the Fish
All ages: K and above
Proceeds go to STCDA